Subject	That's what I'm presently running
Posted by	SactoTodd on February 28, 2005 at 2:32 PM
	This message has been viewed 77 times.
In Reply To	What do you guys think of 255/50-16 tires in back for a tt? (n/m) posted by Quick_Z on February 28, 2005 at 02:21 PM
Message	I bought them used, to shread at the drags a year ago. Dunlop M20 or D20 or something or other. Paid $50 mounted for the pair, I think. They look GREAT from the back, nice wide footprint. From the side, they fill the wheel well nicely, but look a bit balloonish. I have a real set of 245/45 mounted, just never got around to re-installing. If you are buying a new set, I'd recommend 245/45, but if you're just looking to get by with a used pair, and found a killer dealer, no worries. Unless you are going to go canyon racing, they get a bit boingy. -Todd I'm done being nice...some of you are just plain fucking stupid lately - SeedyROM 16:38:52 02/10/05
Follow Ups	What do you guys think of 255/50-16 tires in back for a tt? (n/m) - Quick_Z 14:21:27 02/28/05 Your speedometer would be off - NytWolf 14:23:53 02/28/05 Why? - chenc544 14:28:03 02/28/05 That's what I'm presently running - SactoTodd 14:32:27 02/28/05 boingy? (n/m) - Guapo 14:35:09 02/28/05 Re: That's what I'm presently running - Quick_Z 14:37:57 02/28/05 what do you mean - dvlhntr 14:42:26 02/28/05 Re: what do you mean - Quick_Z 14:49:45 02/28/05 fill out your profile... (n/m) - dvlhntr 01:39:34 03/01/05 you need four tires for cornering - SactoTodd 14:43:00 02/28/05 Re: That's what I'm presently running - boileralum 14:52:22 02/28/05 I don't think the width will bee TOO bad, but the 50's will - Unluky (MO) 14:35:34 02/28/05 I ran drag radials that size, didn't think it looked bad (n/m) - Ron(Houston) 14:48:21 02/28/05 I would be quite itnerested to know: - therin (Plum) 15:29:58 02/28/05 www.tirerack.com (n/m) - MaleficZ 04:40:36 03/01/05 Sounds like you are thinking about the BFG 255/50/16 - SirpriZ 16:16:06 02/28/05 I've had 255/50ZR16 BFG drag radials and 255/50RZ16 regular - MaleficZ 04:40:03 03/01/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.